Re: Inheritance planner CPU and memory usage change since 9.3.2

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Inheritance planner CPU and memory usage change since 9.3.2
Date: 2015-06-19 15:43:12
Message-ID: 18633.1434728592@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On 2015-06-19 01:04, Petr Jelinek wrote:
>> On 2015-06-19 00:38, Petr Jelinek wrote:
>>> On 2015-06-18 22:04, Tom Lane wrote:
>>>> By the by, the tablesample additions to range_table_mutator are
>>>> obviously broken.

> Apparently it's not a good idea to do this at 1AM after long day :/

> The previous diff included some garbage in tests from my local
> experimentations.

Pushed with minor adjustments.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2015-06-19 15:44:53 Re: The real reason why TAP testing isn't ready for prime time
Previous Message Andres Freund 2015-06-19 15:33:39 Re: checkpointer continuous flushing