From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Amir Rohan <amir(dot)rohan(at)mail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: No easy way to join discussion in existing thread when not subscribed |
Date: | 2015-09-27 14:41:11 |
Message-ID: | 1862.1443364871@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
Amir Rohan <amir(dot)rohan(at)mail(dot)com> writes:
> I've read elsewhere that a possible solution is to provide a
> mail address associated with a message (displayed on the web interface)
> that routes your mail message to the thread.
Seems awfully like a here-please-spam-us button. The address would have
to be displayed un-obfuscated, which means it'd get picked up by spammers'
webcrawlers. Admittedly, no one would know except the PG list moderators,
but I think they'd be unhappy about an increase in workload.
And before you ask: yes, spammers still do that. A lot. For example,
just a few hours ago my mailserver bounced something
Sep 27 06:30:05 sss1 sendmail[29150]: t8RAU4Ja029150: <12716(dot)1437746049(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>... User unknown
that certainly has never been used as a mail address, but it does match
a message-ID in the pgsql-hackers archives from July. I see no plausible
explanation for that except that somebody scraped it off the archives and
took it for a deliverable address. This is not an isolated example; I see
anywhere from a couple dozen to several hundred *per day* like this in my
mail logs.
There are ways around that, probably, but I'm not sure it's worth the
work.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David G. Johnston | 2015-09-27 15:02:22 | Re: No easy way to join discussion in existing thread when not subscribed |
Previous Message | Amir Rohan | 2015-09-26 22:02:39 | No easy way to join discussion in existing thread when not subscribed |