Re: For review: Server instrumentation patch

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
Cc: "Stephen Frost" <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Andreas Pflug" <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>, "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: For review: Server instrumentation patch
Date: 2005-07-26 21:01:11
Message-ID: 18606.1122411671@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> writes:
>> I'm OK with them even without the directory limitation as
>> long as there's a way to disable them. However, I fear the
>> whole thing has to wait for 8.2 at this point.

> That would be very bad - considering it just missed 8.0 as well.

[ shrug... ] The same objections were raised during the 8.0 development
cycle, and nothing was done in response, except to submit essentially
the same patch at an equally late stage of the 8.1 cycle. The people
who are interested in this need to put a higher priority on developing
an acceptable patch, or it'll miss the next round as well.

Sorry to be hard-nosed, but I've already expended way more time on this
thread than I can afford just now.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Davis 2005-07-26 21:05:17 Re: ENUM type
Previous Message Jeff Davis 2005-07-26 20:56:11 Re: [HACKERS] Enticing interns to PostgreSQL