Re: SQL command to edit postgresql.conf, with comments

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Darren Duncan <darren(at)darrenduncan(dot)net>, postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SQL command to edit postgresql.conf, with comments
Date: 2010-10-14 15:04:05
Message-ID: 18584.1287068645@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr> writes:
> I understand that. I just think there are already too many sources for
> GUCs and would welcome that there's a single possible source file with a
> complete remote editing feature.

[ shrug... ] So don't use the option of hand-editing postgresql.conf.
You're not being forced to do that, and on the other side of the coin,
you shouldn't think that you get to force people who'd rather hand-edit
to change their habits.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dimitri Fontaine 2010-10-14 15:11:10 Re: SQL command to edit postgresql.conf, with comments
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-10-14 15:00:14 Re: UNION DISTINCT in doc