Re: Vacuum full considered useful ;)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Patric de Waha <lists(at)p-dw(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Vacuum full considered useful ;)
Date: 2007-07-14 16:32:48
Message-ID: 18550.1184430768@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Patric de Waha <lists(at)p-dw(dot)com> writes:
> Yesterday I switched from 8.1 to 8.2. So I needed to dump the dbase
> and reimport it. The dbase after 4 months of running without "vacuum
> full"
> reached 60 gigabyte of diskspace. Now after a fresh import it only
> has 5 gigabyte!

> No wonder, I got IO problems with such a fragmentation.

Indeed, but routine VACUUM FULL is not the best answer. What this
suggests is that you don't have the FSM size (max_fsm_pages and possibly
max_fsm_relations) set high enough for your DB size. If it isn't
big enough then you'll "leak" reusable space over time. Also, if
you are using manual rather than autovacuum you might need to be
vacuuming more often.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Guillaume Lelarge 2007-07-14 16:34:18 Re: Vacuum full considered useful ;)
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2007-07-14 16:25:18 Re: Vacuum full considered useful ;)