| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | List pgsql-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] Infrastructure changes for recovery |
| Date: | 2008-09-18 14:09:43 |
| Message-ID: | 18549.1221746983@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 09:06 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Do we really need a checkpoint there at all?
> "Timelines only change at shutdown checkpoints".
Hmm. I *think* that that is just a debugging crosscheck rather than a
critical property. But yeah, it would take some close investigation,
which maybe isn't warranted if you have a less-invasive solution.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-09-18 14:10:41 | Re: Adding new flags to XLogRecord |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-09-18 14:08:32 | Re: Adding new flags to XLogRecord |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-09-18 14:24:55 | Re: [PATCHES] Infrastructure changes for recovery |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-09-18 13:50:47 | Re: [PATCHES] Infrastructure changes for recovery |