| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Formatting Curmudgeons WAS: MMAP Buffers |
| Date: | 2011-04-18 23:25:33 |
| Message-ID: | 18543.1303169133@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Excerpts from Andrew Dunstan's message of lun abr 18 19:20:30 -0300 2011:
>> On 04/17/2011 11:07 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> ... but maybe it just needs
>>> a more determined effort and/or more recent versions of GNU indent.
>> If you're aware of any changes in GNU indent that would overcome the
>> previous issues, then by all means spend the time on it. If not, it
>> seems a bit like the definition of insanity ("repeating an experiment
>> with the expectation of a different result").
> The source of GNU indent itself is 3x what it was when the experiment
> was last reported. (I checked this about a year ago with an eye on
> "repeating the experiment" but then I failed to actually do it.) It
> seems fair to say that, yes, it has changed a bit in the meantime.
Also, my recollection of the previous go-round is that we gave up rather
quickly. Maybe by now there is somebody willing to put more than
minimal effort into getting the options just so.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Noah Misch | 2011-04-18 23:34:05 | Re: Typed table DDL loose ends |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2011-04-18 22:28:36 | Re: Formatting Curmudgeons WAS: MMAP Buffers |