Re: [pgjdbc] Implement JDBC specs via pre-processor step (#435)

From: Pavel Raiskup <praiskup(at)redhat(dot)com>
To: Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
Cc: Pavel Kajaba <pkajaba(at)redhat(dot)com>, Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com>, List <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Dave Cramer <notifications(at)github(dot)com>, Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [pgjdbc] Implement JDBC specs via pre-processor step (#435)
Date: 2016-01-07 18:53:21
Message-ID: 1854206.szntIFdUzk@nb.usersys.redhat.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

On Thursday 07 of January 2016 13:35:13 Dave Cramer wrote:
> When was the driver last upgraded ?
>
> debian has 1201 which was built with ant.

9.3-1201 or 9.4.1201? Fedora has 9.4-1200, per [1]. I would be
interested how Debian solved the packaging issues.

[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1196445

Pavel

> Dave Cramer
>
> davec(at)postgresintl(dot)com
> www.postgresintl.com
>
> On 7 January 2016 at 12:24, Pavel Raiskup <praiskup(at)redhat(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > On Thursday 07 of January 2016 12:10:04 Dave Cramer wrote:
> > > Before this change we used ant, plus a number of plugins. Which would
> > have
> > > had to have been built from source. Is this somehow different ?
> > >
> > > Dave Cramer
> > > davec(at)postgresintl(dot)com
> >
> > This problem existed before (with ant) too. Due to that, we haven't
> > updated postgresql-jdbc package very-very long ago, so haven't Debian
> > AFAIK.
> >
> > I don't complain! :) Your work is very appreciated. But unfortunately, we
> > are not able to distribute your software ATM and we are trying to change
> > that.
> >
> > Pavel
> >
> >

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Cramer 2016-01-07 18:56:20 Re: [pgjdbc] Implement JDBC specs via pre-processor step (#435)
Previous Message Dave Cramer 2016-01-07 18:35:13 Re: [pgjdbc] Implement JDBC specs via pre-processor step (#435)