| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: WIP: plpgsql source code obfuscation |
| Date: | 2008-04-07 05:07:48 |
| Message-ID: | 18538.1207544868@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>> Added to TODO:
>> o Add ability to obfuscate function bodies
> For the record. I think this todo is bogus.
For the record, I think so too ;-). The agreed-on TODO wording makes no
mention of what an acceptable implementation would look like, and that's
because there very possibly *is* no generally-acceptable implementation.
(Though if someone has a bright new idea, I'm sure we'd all listen.)
The point of the TODO entry is just to acknowledge that this is an issue
for some folk, and that a real solution would be welcomed.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Devrim GÜNDÜZ | 2008-04-07 06:14:32 | Re: WIP: plpgsql source code obfuscation |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2008-04-07 04:59:05 | Re: WIP: plpgsql source code obfuscation |