From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Joost Kraaijeveld" <J(dot)Kraaijeveld(at)Askesis(dot)nl> |
Cc: | "Pgsql-General (E-mail)" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Query, view join question. |
Date: | 2005-01-06 18:39:16 |
Message-ID: | 18524.1105036756@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
"Joost Kraaijeveld" <J(dot)Kraaijeveld(at)Askesis(dot)nl> writes:
> CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW even AS
> SELECT DISTINCT abo_his.klantnummer, abo_his.artikelnummer, abo_his.code_retour, abo_klt.aantal_abonnementen, abo_klt.afgewerkt
> FROM abo_his
> JOIN abo_klt ON abo_his.klantnummer = abo_klt.klantnummer
> WHERE abo_his.abonnement = 238
> ORDER BY abo_his.klantnummer, abo_his.artikelnummer, abo_his.code_retour, abo_klt.aantal_abonnementen, abo_klt.afgewerkt;
Okay ... but the view is constraining abo_his.abonnement and outputting
abo_klt.aantal_abonnementen. Why would you assume that joining on
klantnummer would cause these two fields to necessarily be the same?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-01-06 18:45:59 | Re: pg_dump dependencies |
Previous Message | Eric E | 2005-01-06 18:26:47 | Re: pg_dump dependencies |