Re: Rethinking pg_dump's function sorting code

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, marko(at)joh(dot)to
Subject: Re: Rethinking pg_dump's function sorting code
Date: 2015-03-06 14:31:16
Message-ID: 18521.1425652276@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> writes:
> Comparing argument type names sounds fine. Comparing argument type OID does
> not offer enough to justify the loss of cross-cluster sort equivalence.

Fair enough.

> So as to stably compare f(nsp0.t) to f(nsp1.t), this should also compare the
> dobj.namespace name.

Ah, good point. Will fix.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gabriele Bartolini 2015-03-06 14:38:56 Re: File based Incremental backup v8
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2015-03-06 14:23:44 Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT UPDATE and RLS