| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jeff Davis <jdavis-pgsql(at)empires(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>, PgSQL General List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: index on user defined type |
| Date: | 2005-01-14 01:19:28 |
| Message-ID: | 18500.1105665568@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Jeff Davis <jdavis-pgsql(at)empires(dot)org> writes:
> I attached a proposed documentation patch. I wasn't able to readily see
> the implications of writing a function in SQL regarding an index, so
> perhaps this will help someone in the future (not that many people will
> attempt writing index access methods in SQL, but someone could get
> confused like I did).
Actually the inlining issue is only a problem for the operators, not the
support functions (since the support functions don't appear in queries
that are going to use the index). I applied a modified version of your
patch.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Davis | 2005-01-14 01:45:05 | Re: Version Control Software for Database Objects |
| Previous Message | Clodoaldo Pinto | 2005-01-14 00:58:24 | 7.4.6 FC2 MUCH slower from 2.6.9-1.11 to 2.6.10-1.8 |