From: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: using Core Foundation locale functions |
Date: | 2014-12-01 16:52:53 |
Message-ID: | 184DF9F3-7768-471D-B738-19B85D8F265F@justatheory.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Nov 28, 2014, at 8:43 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
>
> At the moment, this is probably just an experiment that shows where
> refactoring and better abstractions might be suitable if we want to
> support multiple locale libraries. If we want to pursue ICU, I think
> this could be a useful third option.
Gotta say, I’m thrilled to see movement on this front, and especially pleased to see how consensus seems to be building around an abstracted interface to keep options open. This platform-specific example really highlights the need for it (I had no idea that there was separate and more up-to-date collation support in Core Foundation than in the UNIX layer of OS X).
Really looking forward to seeing where we end up.
Best,
David
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alex Shulgin | 2014-12-01 16:58:53 | Re: Turning recovery.conf into GUCs |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2014-12-01 16:09:33 | Re: Buildfarm not happy with test module move |