| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: /contrib/retep to gborg |
| Date: | 2002-10-19 16:16:53 |
| Message-ID: | 18478.1035044213@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> I am concerned that removing them may cause instability, particularly in
> some of the java build scripts. That's why I am suggesting not doing it
> during beta.
Actually, it looks to me like they belong with the JDBC driver. As long
as JDBC is in the main distro, I think we should leave contrib/retep
there too.
There was some talk of moving JDBC to gborg, but I'm not sure what the
plan is, if any.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Nigel J. Andrews | 2002-10-19 16:27:05 | Freeing plan memory |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-10-19 13:39:47 | Re: Open items |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Barry Lind | 2002-10-19 17:27:01 | Re: Getting a ResultSet for a refcursor element. |
| Previous Message | Nic Ferrier | 2002-10-19 12:48:39 | Re: Getting a ResultSet for a refcursor element. |