Re: BUG #2033: Assertion Failure: File: "procarray.c", Line: 492

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Joel Stevenson <joelstevenson(at)mac(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #2033: Assertion Failure: File: "procarray.c", Line: 492
Date: 2005-11-09 19:29:36
Message-ID: 18441.1131564576@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

Joel Stevenson <joelstevenson(at)mac(dot)com> writes:
> This produced a bunch of core files that show the following backtrace:

> #0 0x001ea038 in ?? ()
> #1 0xbfffa4d8 in ?? ()
> #2 0xbfffa5e0 in ?? ()
> #3 0xbfffa560 in ?? ()
> #4 0x08180844 in ?? ()
> #5 0x00000005 in ?? ()
> #6 0xbfffa4e0 in ?? ()
> #7 0x00000000 in ?? ()

> I'm at a loss as to what to do about it, really; is there a hidden
> configure flag or something that could be in my environment that's
> causing the executable to be stripped?

Nondefault LDFLAGS maybe? Look at the commands that link all the
SUBSYS.o files to produce the postgres executable.

Also, on most Unixen "file /path/to/postgres" will tell the difference
between a stripped and nonstripped executable.

If "file" says that the executable isn't stripped, then the problem is
either with gdb itself or with the way you're invoking it. Could we see
a cut-and-paste of the whole terminal session with gdb, rather than just
the result of the bt part?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joel Stevenson 2005-11-09 20:02:36 Re: BUG #2033: Assertion Failure: File: "procarray.c",
Previous Message Joel Stevenson 2005-11-09 19:11:50 Re: BUG #2033: Assertion Failure: File: "procarray.c",

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rod Taylor 2005-11-09 19:58:22 Re: Possible savepoint bug
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-11-09 19:20:30 Re: Possible savepoint bug