From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: EvalPlanQual behaves oddly for FDW queries involving system columns |
Date: | 2015-03-12 04:35:07 |
Message-ID: | 18411.1426134907@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> I will leave this issue for the committer to judge. Changed the status to
> "ready for committer".
I don't like the execMain.c changes much at all. They look somewhat
like they're intended to allow foreign tables to adopt a different
locking strategy, but if so they belong in a different patch that
actually implements such a thing. The changes are not all consistent
either, eg this:
! if (erm->relation &&
! erm->relation->rd_rel->relkind != RELKIND_FOREIGN_TABLE)
is not necessary if this Assert is accurate:
! if (erm->relation)
! {
! Assert(erm->relation->rd_rel->relkind == RELKIND_FOREIGN_TABLE);
I don't see the need for the change in nodeForeignscan.c. If the FDW has
returned a physical tuple, it can fix that for itself, while if it has
returned a virtual tuple, the ctid will be garbage in any case.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2015-03-12 06:49:41 | Re: pg_rewind in contrib |
Previous Message | Ashutosh Bapat | 2015-03-12 03:51:50 | Re: EvalPlanQual behaves oddly for FDW queries involving system columns |