From: | Matthew <matt(at)ctlno(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "'Vince Vielhaber'" <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>, Pete Forman <pete(dot)forman(at)westerngeco(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | RE: beta5 ... |
Date: | 2001-02-22 17:36:28 |
Message-ID: | 183FA749499ED311B6550000F87E206C1FD016@srv.ctlno.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I think UP or SMP should be an option to check, perhaps just a box for the
number of processors. Also something to capture the compile flags. I have
a dual Ppro, and it compiles fine unless I use the -j3 or -j4 commands,
then I get an error.
Matt
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vince Vielhaber [SMTP:vev(at)michvhf(dot)com]
> Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2001 10:57 AM
> To: Pete Forman
> Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: RE: [HACKERS] beta5 ...
>
> On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Pete Forman wrote:
>
> > Vince Vielhaber writes:
> > > On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > >
> > > > What about adding a field where they paste the output of 'uname
> > > > -a' on their system...?
> > >
> > > Got this and Justin's changes along with compiler version. Anyone
> > > think of anything else?
> >
> > Architecture. IRIX, Solaris and AIX allow applications and libraries
> > to be built 32 or 64 bit.
>
> Added.
>
> > You may also like to add a field for configure options used. Or is
> > this just for results OOTB?
>
> That comes later. This part is just for identifying the system itself.
>
> Vince.
> --
> ==========================================================================
> Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSH email: vev(at)michvhf(dot)com http://www.pop4.net
> 128K ISDN from $22.00/mo - 56K Dialup from $16.00/mo at Pop4 Networking
> Online Campground Directory http://www.camping-usa.com
> Online Giftshop Superstore http://www.cloudninegifts.com
> ==========================================================================
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-02-22 18:54:12 | RE: beta5 ... |
Previous Message | Hannu Krosing | 2001-02-22 17:32:25 | Re: RE: Re: [ADMIN] v7.1b4 bad performance |