Re: 64-bit pgsql

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca>
Cc: Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai <asmodai(at)wxs(dot)nl>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 64-bit pgsql
Date: 2003-09-05 15:45:30
Message-ID: 18398.1062776730@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Rod Taylor <rbt(at)rbt(dot)ca> writes:
>> did 7.4 raise the bar on SysV IPC? On my other two boxes I haven't
>> tweaked SysV IPC at all (semmni is at 10) and I get initdb.

> Is this beta 1 or beta 2? Beta 1 has a bug which may require more
> shared resources than what is available.

Actually the bug is in beta2, not beta1. I'd suggest grabbing the
current nightly snapshot (see /dev on the ftp servers) in preference
to beta2, if you are on a machine with small SysV IPC limits.

We'll probably push out a beta3 as soon as the current IPv6 mess is
sorted.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message scott.marlowe 2003-09-05 15:56:15 Re: Seqscan in MAX(index_column)
Previous Message Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai 2003-09-05 15:43:37 Re: 64-bit pgsql