From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: read() returns ERANGE in Mac OS X |
Date: | 2012-05-21 16:43:34 |
Message-ID: | 18365.1337618614@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 12:23 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> If we were sure that the kernel error was permanent, then this argument
>> would be moot: the data is gone already. The scary thought here is that
>> it might be a transient error, such as a not-always-repeatable kernel
>> bug. In that case, zeroing the page would indeed lose data that had
>> been recoverable before.
> Yeah, and in fact I think that's probably not a terribly remote
> scenario. Also, if you're running on dying hardware, you really do
> NOT want to force the kernel to write a whole bunch of pages back to
> the dying disk in the midst of trying to pg_dump it before it falls
> over. You just want to read what you can of what's there now.
Hm? zero_damaged_pages doesn't cause the buffer to be marked dirty,
so I dunno where these alleged writes are coming from.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2012-05-21 16:52:45 | Re: External Open Standards |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2012-05-21 16:41:27 | Re: Archiver not exiting upon crash |