From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Why does pgindent's README say to download typedefs.list from the buildfarm? |
Date: | 2024-05-15 20:23:23 |
Message-ID: | 1833482.1715804603@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 3:30 PM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> This is much cleaner, thanks. The only thing that stands out to me is that
>> the "once per release cycle" section should probably say to do an indent
>> run after downloading the typedef file.
> How's this?
This works for me. One point that could stand discussion while we're
here is whether the once-a-cycle run should use the verbatim buildfarm
results or it's okay to editorialize on that typedefs list. I did a
little of the latter in da256a4a7, and I feel like we should either
bless that practice in this document or decide that it was a bad idea.
For reference, what I added to the buildfarm's list was
+InjectionPointCacheEntry
+InjectionPointCondition
+InjectionPointConditionType
+InjectionPointEntry
+InjectionPointSharedState
+NotificationHash
+ReadBuffersFlags
+ResourceOwnerData
+WaitEventExtension
+WalSyncMethod
I believe all of these must have been added manually during v17.
If I took any one of them out there was some visible disimprovement
in pgindent's results, so I kept them. Was that the right decision?
If so we should explain it here.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David G. Johnston | 2024-05-15 20:24:40 | Re: add function argument names to regex* functions. |
Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2024-05-15 20:22:43 | Re: [DOC] Add detail regarding resource consumption wrt max_connections |