Re: postmaster segfaults with HUGE table

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Cc: Joachim Wieland <joe(at)mcknight(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: postmaster segfaults with HUGE table
Date: 2004-11-16 20:07:43
Message-ID: 1833.1100635663@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> writes:
> Attached is a revised patch -- I just did the check at the end of
> transformStmt(),

Looks OK offhand.

> BTW I figure this should be backpatched to REL7_4_STABLE. Barring any
> objections I will do that (and apply to HEAD) this evening.

No objection here.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Hallgren 2004-11-16 20:28:41 Minor problem with Makefile.shlib
Previous Message subhash 2004-11-16 19:41:45 need help on writing an aggregate function