Re: query_id: jumble names of temp tables for better pg_stat_statement UX

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, ma lz <ma100(at)hotmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: query_id: jumble names of temp tables for better pg_stat_statement UX
Date: 2025-03-22 15:12:39
Message-ID: 1831838.1742656359@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> writes:
> On Sat, Mar 22, 2025 at 10:43:00AM +0100, Christoph Berg wrote:
>> Are we at the point where the patch is already Ready for Committer?

> I'll think a bit more about how to document all that. Anyway, yes,
> I'm OK with the per-field custom_query_jumble, so let's move on with
> that, so I will do something about that.

I'm not terribly happy with the entire proposal.

(1) I know it was asserted upthread that there was no performance
impact, but I find that hard to believe.

(2) This patch inserts catalog lookups into query ID computation,
which AFAIK there never were before. This means you can't compute a
query ID outside a transaction or in an already-failed transaction.
Surely that's going to bite us eventually.

(3) I think having query jumbling work differently for temp tables
than other tables is a fundamentally bad idea.

So my feeling is: if we think this is the behavior we want, let's do
it across the board. I suggest that we simply drop the relid from the
jumble and use the table alias (that is, eref->aliasname) instead.
ISTM this fits well with the general trend in pg_stat_statements
to merge statements together more aggressively than the original
concept envisioned.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Senthilnathan M 2025-03-22 15:31:57 Getting all the plans.
Previous Message Tom Lane 2025-03-22 14:59:10 Re: Nested Stored Procedures - ERROR: invalid transaction termination 2D000

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2025-03-22 16:10:53 Re: making EXPLAIN extensible
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2025-03-22 15:05:29 Re: Next commitfest app release is planned for March 18th