From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com |
Cc: | Robert Bernier <robert(dot)bernier5(at)sympatico(dot)ca>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Upcoming PG re-releases |
Date: | 2005-11-30 22:39:37 |
Message-ID: | 1830.1133390377@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 17:31 -0500, Robert Bernier wrote:
>> I'm for keeping them in some sort of archive for historical reasons. My feeling is that somewhere down the road this will be a big deal.
> We always have the CVS repo, so if we remove them... not big deal.
It's not necessarily that easy to rebuild old releases --- for instance,
modern versions of bison will spit up on our older grammar files, due to
carelessness about semicolons; and newer C compilers may complain about
things that older ones let pass, too.
Unless we're feeling short of disk space on the server, I'm for leaving
them there somewhere. But definitely mark them old and not-recommended.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2005-11-30 22:41:49 | Re: [HACKERS] Upcoming PG re-releases |
Previous Message | Michael Fuhr | 2005-11-30 22:39:16 | Re: Strange interval arithmetic |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2005-11-30 22:41:49 | Re: [HACKERS] Upcoming PG re-releases |
Previous Message | Robert Bernier | 2005-11-30 22:31:18 | Re: [HACKERS] Upcoming PG re-releases |