| From: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dmitry Ivanov <d(dot)ivanov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Declarative partitioning - another take |
| Date: | 2016-12-16 08:58:04 |
| Message-ID: | 182c17bd-da02-4644-cf33-7dbd379bee49@lab.ntt.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2016/12/16 17:38, Greg Stark wrote:
> Just poking around with partitioning. I notice that "\d parent"
> doesn't list all the partitions, suggesting to use \d+ but a plain
> "\d" does indeed list the partitions. That seems a bit strange and
> also probably impractical if you have hundreds or thousands of
> partitions. Has this come up in previous discussions? Unfortunately
> it's proving a bit hard to search for "\d" :/
Do you mean a plain "\d" (without an argument) should not list tables that
are partitions? I think that might be preferable. That would mean, we
list only the root partitioned tables with a plain "\d".
Regarding "\d parent", it does the same thing as regular inheritance, but
using the term "partition" instead of "child table". Without specifying a
+ (\d parent), one gets just "Number of partitions: # (Use \d+ to list
them.)" and with + (\d+ parent), one gets the full list of partitions
showing the partition bound with each.
Thanks,
Amit
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Langote | 2016-12-16 09:04:20 | Re: Declarative partitioning - another take |
| Previous Message | Amit Langote | 2016-12-16 08:42:54 | Re: Declarative partitioning - another take |