Re: Correct handling of blank/commented lines in PSQL interactive-mode history

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Greg Nancarrow <gregn4422(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Correct handling of blank/commented lines in PSQL interactive-mode history
Date: 2021-12-01 17:26:06
Message-ID: 1828712.1638379566@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> writes:
> On 2021-Nov-29, Tom Lane wrote:
>> After some further hackery, here's a set of patches that I think
>> might be acceptable. They're actually fairly independent, although
>> they touch different aspects of the same behavior.

> I tried the collection and I find the overall behavior quite convenient.
> I think it works just as I wish it would.

Hearing no further comments, pushed.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Florin Irion 2021-12-01 17:47:40 Re: Reserve prefixes for loaded libraries proposal
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2021-12-01 16:38:25 Re: RecoveryInProgress() has critical side effects