From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk> |
Cc: | david(at)kineticode(dot)com ("David E(dot) Wheeler"), pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: latest hstore patch |
Date: | 2009-09-29 22:56:02 |
Message-ID: | 18279.1254264962@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
[ starting to look at this now... ]
Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk> writes:
> "David" == "David E Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> writes:
> David> * More name stuff: Why `hstore_to_list` rather than
> David> `hstore_to_array`? And I'm not sure about `hstore_to_matrix`
> David> for the 2-dimensional array. I guess that's better than
> David> `hstore_to_multidimensional_array` would be. ;-)
> I intentionally avoided hstore_to_array because it would be unclear
> which one it meant (the 1-d or 2-d result).
hstore_to_list seems like a pretty horrible name though for something
that produces an array. I also note that "array" means "1-D array"
according to no less an authority than the SQL standard ;-). I think
we could live with hstore_to_array and hstore_to_matrix. Thoughts,
other ideas?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Gierth | 2009-09-29 23:11:53 | Re: latest hstore patch |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2009-09-29 22:50:52 | Re: Unicode UTF-8 table formatting for psql text output |