Re: Vacuum goes worse

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Scott Marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Stéphane Schildknecht <stephane(dot)schildknecht(at)postgresqlfr(dot)org>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Vacuum goes worse
Date: 2007-10-16 16:03:16
Message-ID: 18249.1192550596@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

"Scott Marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On 10/16/07, St=E9phane Schildknecht
> <stephane(dot)schildknecht(at)postgresqlfr(dot)org> wrote:
>> That's also why I am so disappointed vacuum doesn't give me these 4
>> hints lines.

> What kind of error, or output, does it give you at the end? Any hint
> as to why they're missing?

If you're talking about the FSM statistics display, that only gets
printed by a database-wide VACUUM (one that doesn't name a specific
table).

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Brian Herlihy 2007-10-17 00:03:39 Re: Vacuum goes worse
Previous Message 李彦 Ian Li 2007-10-16 16:00:57 Re: Autovacuum running out of memory