From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: 8.4 open items list |
Date: | 2009-03-28 16:25:16 |
Message-ID: | 18237.1238257516@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 11:42 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Both of those things are related to 8.4 feature changes, so we should
>> either do them now or decide we won't do them.
> Well, "Should we have a LOCALE option in CREATE DATABASE?" has to do
> with making:
> CREATE DATABASE foo WITH LOCALE = bar
> equivalent to...
> CREATE DATABASE foo WITH COLLATE = bar, CTYPE = bar
> That might be nice to have, but since it's just syntactic sugar, I
> disagree that it's now or never.
The reason I wanted it considered now is that part of the discussion
was about whether to rename the existing options (add or remove LC_,
I forget which). Once 8.4 is out it'll be too late to reconsider that.
> The second item, "Should we reject toast.fillfactor in reloptions?",
> comes with a patch. I think I agree with ITAGAKI Takahiro that it
> would be better to have reloptions specify a set of RELOPT_KINDs to
> which they pertain rather than a single one.
+1. And this is something it'd be better to get right now than later,
since it's about an API that's meant to be used by add-on modules.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-03-28 16:47:31 | Re: question about deparsing const node and its typmod |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2009-03-28 16:06:47 | Re: 8.4 open items list |