From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: search_path vs extensions |
Date: | 2009-05-27 21:14:32 |
Message-ID: | 18218.1243458872@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Another way of handling this might be to provide for prepending or
> appending to the search path (or even for removing items from it).
I was just about to raise that as a requirement. Some folks on this
list might recognize the following coding pattern:
create schema rhn_channel;
--make rhn_channel be the default creation schema
update pg_settings set setting = 'rhn_channel,' || setting where name = 'search_path';
... create a bunch of objects in schema rhn_channel ...
-- restore the original setting
update pg_settings set setting = overlay( setting placing '' from 1 for (length('rhn_channel')+1) ) where name = 'search_path';
I agree that a nicer way to do that would be good.
> alter database foo set search_path = '+bar, baz'; -- append
> alter database foo set search_path = 'bar, baz+'; -- prepend
... but that ain't it :-(. SET should mean SET, not "do something magic".
Particularly in ALTER DATABASE/ALTER USER, whose execution order
relative to other stuff isn't especially well defined.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2009-05-27 21:16:07 | Re: New trigger option of pg_standby |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2009-05-27 21:09:03 | Re: A couple of regression test anomalies |