From: | David Hoksza <david(dot)hoksza(at)seznam(dot)cz> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pg_statio_all_indexes |
Date: | 2006-07-30 19:00:18 |
Message-ID: | 18210304510.20060730210018@seznam.cz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Yes, you are right. I now tried to select from one table various amount of
records and when the amount exceeded some given number so the blks_hit begun
fall.
Thanks,
David Hoksza
________________________________
30. července 2006, 20:24:33, napsal jste:
TL> David Hoksza <david(dot)hoksza(at)seznam(dot)cz> writes:
>> Hi, I'm not sure about the value idx_blks_hit of pg_statio_all_indexes
>> view. Is it total value of touched pages, or do I get total value when
>> I add idx_blks_read to it?
>> In other words - does idx_blks_hit cover also physical reads?
TL> I believe blks_hit is the number of page requests that were found in
TL> cache and hence did *not* require a read(). The other column is the
TL> number of page requests that *did* require a read().
TL> regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dawid Kuroczko | 2006-07-30 20:22:43 | Re: Secure connections with changing ip addresses? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-07-30 18:24:33 | Re: pg_statio_all_indexes |