From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | depesz(at)depesz(dot)com |
Cc: | Martin Pitt <mpitt(at)debian(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Changed behaviour of \' |
Date: | 2011-05-10 16:44:37 |
Message-ID: | 18205.1305045877@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz(at)depesz(dot)com> writes:
> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 06:20:23PM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
>> Since HISTORY does not mention this, is that an explicit decision to
>> finally deprecate the old \' syntax (which would be great, as it makes
>> this thing a lot more robust and deterministic, but it might be worth
>> mentioning it in HISTORY), or an unintended side effect?
> release notes clearly mentions is:
> http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/release-9-1.html
> - Change the default value of standard_conforming_strings to on (Robert Haas)
> This removes a long-standing incompatibility with the SQL standard;
> escape_string_warning has produced warnings about this usage for years. E''
> strings are the proper way to embed escapes in strings and are unaffected by
> this change.
Hmm ... considering that's the first thing in the release notes, I'm
surprised Martin missed it. Maybe he was looking for something
mentioning backslashes ... should we add a bit that specifically says
that backslashes are now no-ops by default?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Martin Pitt | 2011-05-10 21:11:12 | Re: Changed behaviour of \' |
Previous Message | hubert depesz lubaczewski | 2011-05-10 16:37:02 | Re: Changed behaviour of \' |