Re: configurability of OOM killer

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
Cc: Dawid Kuroczko <qnex42(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com>, Decibel! <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: configurability of OOM killer
Date: 2008-02-07 23:25:07
Message-ID: 18184.1202426707@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> writes:
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 08:22:42PM +0100, Dawid Kuroczko wrote:
>> ....while we are at it -- one feature would be great for 8.4, an
>> ability to shange shared buffers size "on the fly".

> Shared memory segments can't be resized... There's not even a kernel
> API to do it.

Even if there were, it seems unlikely that we could reallocate shared
memory without stopping all active transactions, so it'd be barely less
invasive than a postmaster restart anyhow.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gevik Babakhani 2008-02-07 23:33:29 Re: TODO item:Allow to_date() and to_timestamp() accept localized month names
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-02-07 23:23:07 Re: Why are we waiting?