Re: should check interrupts in BuildRelationExtStatistics ?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: should check interrupts in BuildRelationExtStatistics ?
Date: 2022-07-12 20:31:39
Message-ID: 1818293.1657657899@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I wrote:
> Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Wed, Jul 6, 2022 at 11:37 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> qsort_interruptible

>> +1

> So here's a patch that does it that way.

Hearing no comments, pushed.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2022-07-12 20:35:46 Re: making relfilenodes 56 bits
Previous Message Tom Lane 2022-07-12 19:49:11 Re: automatically generating node support functions