Re: pgsql: Add relation fork support to pg_relation_size() function.

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Greg Stark" <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, "Marko Kreen" <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql: Add relation fork support to pg_relation_size() function.
Date: 2008-10-06 12:02:35
Message-ID: 18178.1223294555@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

"Greg Stark" <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> On the other hand if they do have a problem with multiple periods they
> won't find out until they have a pretty big database already and are
> kind of stuck. And our regression tests won't test it at all.

Yeah. +1 for the _fsm approach, just in case.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2008-10-06 13:05:40 pgsql: Add columns boot_val and reset_val to the pg_settings view, to
Previous Message Greg Stark 2008-10-06 10:48:50 Re: pgsql: Add relation fork support to pg_relation_size() function.

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-10-06 12:23:19 Re: Weird behaviour with ALTER TABLE ... SET TABLESPACE ... statement
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2008-10-06 11:46:11 Re: About postgresql8.3.3 build in MS VS2005