| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Cc: | josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>, Qing Zhao <qzhao(at)quotefx(dot)net>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: column size too large, is this a bug? |
| Date: | 2004-03-26 03:11:36 |
| Message-ID: | 18149.1080270696@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> Is there still someone around who's working on getting a similar patch
> into 7.5? Seems there huge user demand for such a thing...
Andrew Overholt did some preliminary work toward implementing the
SQL99-spec WITH functionality (which subsumes what CONNECT BY does,
and a few other things too). But he's left Red Hat and gone back
to school. One of the many things on my todo list is to pick up that
patch and get it finished.
IIRC Andrew had finished the parser work and we had a paper design for
the executor support.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2004-03-26 03:38:47 | Re: column size too large, is this a bug? |
| Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2004-03-26 03:00:46 | Re: column size too large, is this a bug? |