Re: owner as namespace?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
Cc: James Harper <james(dot)harper(at)bendigoit(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: owner as namespace?
Date: 2006-02-08 23:43:41
Message-ID: 18140.1139442221@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> writes:
> IIRC, the idea of a schema came from Oracle where the schema is the
> username. If you create a schema with the same name as the user what
> you describe above works. ie mydb.james.myview is in the james schema
> in the mydb database.

Actually that isn't an Oracle-ism, it's a reasonable interpretation of
the minimum requirements of the SQL standard: if you associate each user
with a schema named after and owned by that user, you get the minimum
spec behavior. It sounds like MSSQL is doing about the same thing.

Our default search_path setting is set up to support this usage, btw.
See "Usage Patterns" in the schema documentation.
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/static/ddl-schemas.html

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-02-09 00:06:25 Re: Confirming the autovacuum daemon is running
Previous Message Rodolfo Campos 2006-02-08 23:36:43 Re: Insert into other database