| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Florian G(dot) Pflug" <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Postgresql-Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Inspection of row types in pl/pgsql and pl/sql |
| Date: | 2009-11-14 20:31:05 |
| Message-ID: | 18108.1258230665@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Florian G. Pflug" <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org> writes:
> Still, doing that SELECT seems rather silly since NEW and OLD already
> contain the required information. So I still believe that having
> something like record_name() and record_types() would be useful. And at
> least these functions have less of an issue with the type system...
Yeah. I don't have any objection in principle to providing such
functions; I'm just wondering how far that really goes towards
solving real-world problems.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Gierth | 2009-11-14 20:33:51 | Re: add more frame types in window functions (ROWS) |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-11-14 20:24:11 | Re: Inspection of row types in pl/pgsql and pl/sql |