Re: Including PL/PgSQL by default

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Including PL/PgSQL by default
Date: 2008-02-19 17:50:16
Message-ID: 18105.1203443416@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> writes:
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 12:11:05PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> This has been proposed before, and rejected before. Have you got
>> any new arguments?

> The longer it's been since the last vuln in PL/PgSQL, the harder it is
> to argue for having it not be there by default.

You are attacking a straw man, which is that the only argument against
having PL/PgSQL installed is the risk of security holes in it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2008-02-19 17:58:07 Re: CVS repository invalid revision
Previous Message Roberts, Jon 2008-02-19 17:37:30 Re: Permanent settings