From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Ron Mayer" <ron(at)intervideo(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pgsql-server/ oc/src/sgml/datatype.sgml rc/bac ... |
Date: | 2003-12-20 19:11:29 |
Message-ID: | 18101.1071947489@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-patches |
momjian(at)svr1(dot)postgresql(dot)org (Bruce Momjian) writes:
> Attached is a patch that addressed all the discussed issues that
> did not break backward compatability,
Was this patch actually agreed to? I hadn't gotten around to looking
at it because I thought Peter was still objecting to the whole idea.
> including the ability to
> output ISO-8601 compliant intervals by setting datestyle to
> iso8601basic.
This is a horrid, horrid idea. Datestyle is already a complete mess
because it is being used to control several things; it should have been
two or possibly three GUC variables not one. Sticking in yet another
behavior is just not acceptable IMHO, especially when it's defined as
non-orthogonally as that.
Please revert that part of the patch and instead invent a new GUC
variable that's specifically for interval formatting.
BTW, I can tell without looking that the patch is deficient in
documentation; if it has effects on GUC variables, why is there no
mod in runtime.sgml?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-12-20 22:18:02 | pgsql-server/src/backend/storage/buffer bufmgr.c |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-12-20 18:46:02 | pgsql-server/src/interfaces/libpq Tag: REL7_4_ ... |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-12-21 04:26:04 | Re: [GENERAL] Temporary tables and miscellaneous schemas |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-12-20 17:33:22 | Re: fork/exec patch |