From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Henry B(dot) Hotz" <hotz(at)jpl(dot)nasa(dot)gov> |
Cc: | hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Testing, Hello? |
Date: | 1998-11-26 00:18:37 |
Message-ID: | 181.912039517@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Henry B. Hotz" <hotz(at)jpl(dot)nasa(dot)gov> writes:
> I'm still testing, but basically it looks like if you have kerberos 4 then
> you need to disable use of the system crypt routines. This *should* be
> handled in the configure stuff.
That's fairly unpleasant, since it's not out of the question that a
given site might need to support both auth methods to cope with varying
clients.
> The function des_encrypt exists in both the KTH kerberos and the system
> crypt libraries with different arguments.
Not everywhere --- there's no such routine in my crypt library, for
instance. I would not like to see kerberos + crypt disabled everywhere
because it does not work on your machine.
Ideally we'd need an autoconf test to discover whether kerberos and
crypt libraries are compatible on a given machine, and an autoconf
--with switch to allow the user to decide which one to include if
they're not. Do you have any ideas about a simple way to check whether
this problem exists on a given platform?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | The Hermit Hacker | 1998-11-26 02:17:58 | Re: [HACKERS] temporary tables ? |
Previous Message | Oliver Elphick | 1998-11-25 23:48:51 | Failures with arrays |