| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Banck <mbanck(at)gmx(dot)net>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Kumar, Sachin" <ssetiya(at)amazon(dot)com>, Robins Tharakan <tharakan(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jan Wieck <jan(at)wi3ck(dot)info>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pg_upgrade failing for 200+ million Large Objects |
| Date: | 2024-07-26 20:05:50 |
| Message-ID: | 1809775.1722024350@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 5:18 PM Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> wrote:
>> We'd surely prefer that the transaction size be configurable.
> I think we can add an option to pg_upgrade. But I wonder if there is
> something else we can do.
Yeah, I'm not enamored of adding a command-line option, if only
because I think a lot of people invoke pg_upgrade through
vendor-provided scripts that aren't going to cooperate with that.
If we can find some way to make it adapt without help, that
would be much better.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alexander Korotkov | 2024-07-26 20:10:29 | Re: Assertion failure with summarize_wal enabled during pg_createsubscriber |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2024-07-26 20:02:47 | Re: Converting tab-complete.c's else-if chain to a switch |