Re: another plperl bug

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: another plperl bug
Date: 2004-11-22 20:34:17
Message-ID: 18085.1101155657@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org> writes:
> I ran the following tests on 8.0.0beta5, which I think includes
> Tom's latest changes:

Thanks for the examples. I extended this into a simple regression test
which I've added to CVS. If anyone would like to add some test cases
for more interesting stuff (triggers and error handling come to mind),
step right up ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-11-22 20:38:26 Re: another plperl bug
Previous Message Christopher Browne 2004-11-22 20:16:53 Re: pg_dump for values inserted in last day

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-11-22 20:38:26 Re: another plperl bug
Previous Message Andreas Pflug 2004-11-22 17:34:51 htmlhelp generation