From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_stat_bgwriter broken? |
Date: | 2010-11-15 00:35:57 |
Message-ID: | 18027.1289781357@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> The way you've explained it now, I see why it's not worth adding a
> specific regression test for this in the future, and what else I should
> have checked when I ran into my problem (that other system stats views
> were also working or not).
FWIW, I wouldn't object to a test that somehow exercised the specific
functionality of the view; I was just dubious that there was any value
in the sort of test you were suggesting. We found ways to exercise the
table-counter stuff in a sufficiently reproducible way for the stats
test --- can you do something similar here?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Smith | 2010-11-15 01:02:46 | Re: CommitFest 2010-11: Call for Reviewers |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-11-15 00:27:50 | Re: Count backend self-sync calls |