From: | Holger Jakobs <holger(at)jakobs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Automating removal of orphaned stored procedure calls |
Date: | 2022-07-12 17:10:10 |
Message-ID: | 17ace17d-eff0-f198-7bbc-74c87957a8ae@jakobs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Am 12.07.22 um 18:58 schrieb John Scalia:
> One of our newer applications is regularly leaving some stored procedures in a partially completed state. It’s not one of my applications, and the DBA responsible for it hasn’t said why this happens, but he is trying to automate removing these. Currently, it’s a manual process where they log into the db as the application owner which owns these and remove them manually. For whatever reason he can’t use the application owner’s I’d to run this process. I suggested adding the application owner as a group for the actual user he is going to use, and once that happened, using a SET ROLE to become that user, but it did not apparently work. Anybody have any good ideas here to make this work?
> Sent from my iPad (How nice you are advertising the device you are using. Is this relevant to your question?)
I cannot see any connection between a transaction "hanging" and the
usage of stored procedures. Of course it can happen anywhere, if a
transaction is trying to update rows another transaction has updated
without having completed.
Try to find out by looking into pg_locks what is happening.
--
Holger Jakobs, Bergisch Gladbach, Tel. +49-178-9759012
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mladen Gogala | 2022-07-12 17:57:42 | Re: Improve "select count(*)" query - takes more than 30 mins for some large tables |
Previous Message | John Scalia | 2022-07-12 16:58:34 | Automating removal of orphaned stored procedure calls |