| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: strange failure in plpgsql_control tests (on fulmar, ICC 14.0.3) |
| Date: | 2018-03-17 19:41:15 |
| Message-ID: | 17998.1521315675@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> On March 17, 2018 12:25:57 PM PDT, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> If we're not putting a test into the back branches, then we darn well
>> better be using the same code there as in HEAD, else we won't know that
>> it actually solves the problem.
> I was thinking of committing your version everywhere and then revising in master after a bf cycle.
Meh. I don't really feel a need to change it at all, but if we do,
I think it should be "after a release cycle" not just a few days.
We need to see whether that regression test will expose any problems
on a wider variety of compilers than exist in the buildfarm.
Anyway, pushed for now --- Tomas, if you blocked fulmar, it should
be safe to unblock.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | john frazer | 2018-03-17 19:54:04 | Fwd: Problems with Error Messages wrt Domains, Checks |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2018-03-17 19:32:33 | Re: strange failure in plpgsql_control tests (on fulmar, ICC 14.0.3) |