From: | "Mark Woodward" <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "John DeSoi" <desoi(at)pgedit(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? |
Date: | 2006-05-18 19:11:09 |
Message-ID: | 17994.24.91.171.78.1147979469.squirrel@mail.mohawksoft.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
> Jim C. Nasby wrote:
>> Maybe a compatability layer isn't worth doing, but I certainly think
>> it's very much worthwhile for the community to do everything possible to
>> encourage migration from MySQL. We should be able to lay claim to most
>> advanced and most popular OSS database.
>>
>
> We'll do that by concentrating on spiffy features, not compatibility
> layers. I want people to use PostgreSQL because it's the best, not
> because it's just like something else.
>
While I do agree with the ideal, the reality may not be good enough. Even
I, a PostgreSQL user for a decade, have to use MySQL right now because
that is what the client uses.
Again, there is so much code for MySQL, a MySQL emulation layer, MEL for
short, could allow plug and play compatibility for open source, and closed
source, applications that otherwise would force a PostgreSQL user to hold
his or her nose and use MySQL.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-05-18 19:17:24 | Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? |
Previous Message | Thomas Hallgren | 2006-05-18 19:04:12 | Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-05-18 19:17:24 | Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? |
Previous Message | Thomas Hallgren | 2006-05-18 19:04:12 | Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? |