| From: | PG Bug reporting form <noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org> | 
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org | 
| Cc: | exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com | 
| Subject: | BUG #17959: amcheck fails to find a matching index tuple for an invisible heap tuple | 
| Date: | 2023-06-03 19:00:01 | 
| Message-ID: | 17959-0d691c29037366ab@postgresql.org | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs | 
The following bug has been logged on the website:
Bug reference:      17959
Logged by:          Alexander Lakhin
Email address:      exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com
PostgreSQL version: 16beta1
Operating system:   Ubuntu 22.04
Description:        
After some DDL/transactional operations (a reproducer to follow)
pg_amcheck detects an anomaly:
btree index "regress001.pg_catalog.pg_depend_reference_index":
    ERROR:  heap tuple (13,35) from table "pg_depend" lacks matching index
tuple within index "pg_depend_reference_index"
The corresponding table heap page contains:
 lp | lp_off | lp_flags | lp_len | t_xmin | t_xmax | t_field3 | t_ctid  |
t_infomask2 | t_infomask | t_hoff | t_bits | t_oid |                        
                   t_attrs                                            |     
                           raw_flags                                 |
combined_flags
 35 |   6232 |        1 |     49 |    734 |    736 |        2 | (13,35) |   
    8199 |       1280 |     24 |        |       |
{"\\xeb040000","\\x38400000","\\x00000000","\\x370a0000","\\x36400000","\\x00000000","\\x6e"}
| {HEAP_XMIN_COMMITTED,HEAP_XMAX_COMMITTED,HEAP_KEYS_UPDATED}              
| {}
 pg_depend_reference_index contains:
 itemoffset |   ctid    | itemlen | nulls | vars |                      data
                      | dead |  htid   |
        157 | (13,35)   |      24 | f     | f    | 37 0a 00 00 36 40 00 00
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 | t    | (13,35) |
SELECT ctid, * FROM pg_depend WHERE refclassid = 0x0a37 AND refobjid =
0x4036 AND refobjsubid = 0
doesn't return any rows.
Shouldn't amcheck ignore invisible tuples?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2023-06-04 00:36:02 | Re: BUG #17953: Libpq can stall indefinitely with non-tls localhost (127.0.0.1) connection | 
| Previous Message | Jeff Davis | 2023-06-03 16:23:06 | Re: BUG #17945: Different order of definition of a constraint causes constraint violation |