| From: | Alexander Loginov <sas(at)mplik(dot)ru> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re[2]: Perfomance decreasing |
| Date: | 2001-08-16 19:41:03 |
| Message-ID: | 1794778431.20010817014103@mplik.ru |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hello,
>>> I'm doing vacuum periodically (once a hour), but perfomance
>>> still falls down.
TL> It sounds to me like you may be running into index growth problems.
TL> VACUUM is presently not good about shrinking indexes. If you drop
TL> and recreate the indexes used by your most important queries, does
TL> the performance go back to where it was?
Thanks for solution. After REINDEX command for most significant
tables, perfomance was restored. I will do this procedure every
two days.
I have only one small question. Can I do REINDEX during inserting
of information into tables. Or I must block somehow updating of
tables.
Best regards,
Alexander Loginov mailto:sas(at)mplik(dot)ru
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | newsreader | 2001-08-16 19:48:23 | Re: unix timestamp |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-08-16 19:39:36 | Re: race conditions in my sequences |