Re: [HACKERS] Tuple length limit

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, "Vadim B(dot) Mikheev" <vadim(at)krs(dot)ru>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Tuple length limit
Date: 1999-07-04 13:55:44
Message-ID: 17907.931096544@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> Can someone tell me what the maximum tuple length is?

I had always thought that the limit was supposed to be BLCKSZ less
overhead.

> Here is what I found with the new code. Seems it works.
> test=> vacuum;
> VACUUM

Wasn't the complaint that started this thread something about "peculiar
behavior" of VACUUM with big tuples? Might be wise to check VACUUM more
closely.

regards, tom lane

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 1999-07-04 14:18:30 Re: [INTERFACES] Time and microseconds?
Previous Message Herouth Maoz 1999-07-04 10:10:17 Re: [INTERFACES] Time and microseconds?