| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
| Cc: | "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org, "PostgreSQL-patches" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] postmaster.pid |
| Date: | 2004-08-26 15:23:39 |
| Message-ID: | 17906.1093533819@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers-win32 pgsql-patches |
"Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
>> ISTM we should not ever queue any event for signal 0.
> That was my original intention, however Magnus thought it best just to
> let it be queued and subsequently ignored by the backend - thinking
> about it 15 minutes later I can't for the life of me think why that's
> any better...
Are there any error cases that we would miss detecting if it didn't go
that far?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher Browne | 2004-08-26 15:27:28 | Re: Win32 release warning |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2004-08-26 15:07:18 | Re: [PATCHES] postmaster.pid |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Johannes Weberhofer | 2004-08-26 15:31:06 | Backported the very useful oracle_compat.c from postgres 8.0 beta to 7.4.5 |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2004-08-26 15:07:18 | Re: [PATCHES] postmaster.pid |